How Images Affect Core Web Vitals (2026 Guide)
Images drive LCP failures on 78% of pages and account for 45–55% of page weight. This 2026 guide shows you exactly how to fix image-related Core Web Vitals issues using AVIF conversion, responsive srcset, fetchpriority, and lazy loading — with code examples you can implement today.
Smolpix
0 views
Introduction Images are the single biggest factor affecting your Core Web Vitals scores — particularly LCP (Largest Contentful Paint), which Google uses directly as a ranking signal. According to [HTTP Archive](https://httparchive.org) (2026), images account for 45–55% of total page weight, and unoptimized images are responsible for the majority of LCP failures across the web. Most developers focus on JavaScript bundles and server response times while leaving their largest assets completely untouched. A single hero image served at the wrong size or format can push your LCP from 1.8 seconds to 4+ seconds — instantly moving you from "Good" to "Poor" in Google's assessment. This guide covers everything you need to know to fix image-related Core Web Vitals issues in 2026: - Why the **vitals image** relationship is more critical than ever
- Which image formats deliver the best compression in 2026
- Step-by-step optimization workflow you can implement today
- The most common mistakes that silently kill your scores
- Pro techniques used by high-performance engineering teams ---
Table of Contents
--- ## Key Points The single most impactful action you can take for Core Web Vitals in 2026 is converting your images to AVIF or WebP and serving them responsively — this alone can improve LCP by 40–60% on image-heavy pages. 1. LCP is image-driven on 78% of pages. According to Google's Web Vitals report (2026), the LCP element is an image on the vast majority of real-world pages. That means your image optimization strategy is your Core Web Vitals strategy. 2. Images consume 45–55% of page weight. HTTP Archive (2026) data shows the average desktop page weighs 2.5–3MB, with images representing the largest share. Mobile pages average 2MB — still dominated by image bytes. 3. AVIF delivers 50%+ compression savings vs. JPEG. Switching your hero image from JPEG to AVIF at the same visual quality can cut its file size in half, directly reducing the bytes the browser must download before LCP fires. 4. Lazy loading reduces initial payload by 30–50%. Deferring below-the-fold images means the browser focuses bandwidth on the LCP element first, measurably improving both LCP and First Input Delay (FID). 5. CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift) is caused by missing image dimensions. Every image without explicit #27272a] text-[#00D4AA] rounded text-sm'>width and height attributes is a potential layout shift. Google's [Web.dev guidance confirms this is one of the top CLS culprits in 2026. ## Step-by-Step Guide Here's how to fix image-related Core Web Vitals issues in 5 clear steps: Step 1 — Audit your current image performance Open Google PageSpeed Insights and run your URL. Under the "Opportunities" section, look for:
- "Serve images in next-gen formats" (AVIF/WebP)
- "Properly size images" (responsive images)
- "Defer offscreen images" (lazy loading)
- "Image elements do not have explicit width and height" (CLS) These four flags cover 90% of image-related Core Web Vitals failures. Step 2 — Convert to AVIF with WebP fallback For every JPEG or PNG on your site, create an AVIF version (primary) and a WebP version (fallback). Use the
The #27272a] text-[#00D4AA] rounded text-sm'>fetchpriority="high" attribute on your LCP image tells the browser to prioritize downloading it immediately — a technique [MDN Web Docs confirms can shave 200–400ms off LCP. Step 3 — Implement responsive images with srcset Serving a 2400px image to a 375px mobile screen wastes 85%+ of the bytes downloaded. Fix this with srcset and sizes: html
> > 💡 Quick Tip: Want to skip the manual conversion work? Try Smolpix — it converts JPEG/PNG to AVIF and WebP in seconds, automating Steps 2 and 3 entirely. Step 4 — Add explicit dimensions to every image Every width and height attributes matching the image's intrinsic dimensions. This lets the browser reserve space before the image loads, eliminating layout shift (CLS). This is non-negotiable for a "Good" CLS score. Step 5 — Preload your LCP image For your above-the-fold hero image, add a tag in the . This starts the download before the browser even parses the : html
> According to web.dev (2025), preloading the LCP image typically reduces LCP by 0.5–1.2 seconds on real-world pages. ## Pro Tips The most impactful tip for 2026 is combining AVIF compression with a CDN that serves images from edge locations — this addresses both file size and network latency simultaneously, the two biggest contributors to slow LCP. 1. Prioritize AVIF for all new uploads. AVIF's 50%+ compression advantage over JPEG is now accessible to 90%+ of your visitors according to Can I Use (2026). The WebP fallback covers the remaining edge cases. Don't wait — the browser support argument for avoiding AVIF is no longer valid. 2. Use a CDN with automatic image optimization. Cloudflare Polish automatically converts and compresses images at the edge, serving AVIF or WebP based on the visitor's browser — zero code changes required. This is the fastest path to format optimization for existing sites. 3. Implement lazy loading for all below-fold images. The loading="lazy" attribute is supported in 97%+ of browsers and requires zero JavaScript. Pair it with explicit width and height to prevent CLS: html
> 4. Use decoding="async" on non-critical images. This tells the browser to decode images off the main thread, keeping the UI responsive. Add it alongside loading="lazy" on any image that isn't your LCP element. 5. Audit image compression quarterly. Browser support evolves, and new tools emerge. Set a calendar reminder to re-run PageSpeed Insights every quarter — a mid-size e-commerce store running on Shopify found a 23% LCP improvement just by re-auditing and updating image formats after a 6-month gap. | Technique | Compression Savings | Browser Support | Difficulty |
| ----------- | --------------------- | ----------------- | ------------ | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVIF | 50%+ vs JPEG | 90%+ | Easy | ||||
| Responsive Images (srcset) | 40–60% on mobile | 100% | Medium | ## Common Mistakes to Avoid The #1 mistake in 2026 is serving full-resolution images without a responsive `srcset` — mobile users end up downloading desktop-sized files, bloating their payload by 3–5x. Here's how to avoid the most damaging errors. 1. **Skipping `fetchpriority="high"` on the LCP image.** Without this attribute, the browser treats your hero image with the same priority as every other resource. The fix is a single HTML attribute — there's no excuse not to add it. Every page with an above-fold image should have this. 2. **Using `loading="lazy"` on above-the-fold images.** Lazy loading defers image downloads — that's the point. But applying it to your LCP element tells the browser to *wait* before loading your most critical image, directly worsening LCP. Only lazy load images that appear below the fold. 3. **Forgetting `width` and `height` on dynamically loaded images.** CMS platforms like WordPress often strip dimension attributes from uploaded images. Without them, every image causes layout shift as it loads. Always re-add dimensions, even if your CMS removes them. | Mistake | Why It's Bad (2026 Data) | Better Approach |
| --------- | -------------------------- | ------------------ | |||||
| Using only JPEG/PNG | Missing 30–50% compression savings vs AVIF/WebP | Use AVIF with WebP + JPEG fallbacks | |||||
| No responsive images | Mobile users download 3–5x oversized files | Implement srcset + sizes attributes | |||||
| Missing lazy loading | Non-critical images compete for bandwidth with LCP | Add loading="lazy" to all below-fold images | |||||
| Lazy loading the LCP image | Directly delays the most important render metric | Use fetchpriority="high" instead |
| WebP | 25–35% vs JPEG | 97%+ | Easy | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Responsive Images (srcset) | 40–60% on mobile | 100% | Medium | ## Common Mistakes to Avoid The #1 mistake in 2026 is serving full-resolution images without a responsive `srcset` — mobile users end up downloading desktop-sized files, bloating their payload by 3–5x. Here's how to avoid the most damaging errors. 1. **Skipping `fetchpriority="high"` on the LCP image.** Without this attribute, the browser treats your hero image with the same priority as every other resource. The fix is a single HTML attribute — there's no excuse not to add it. Every page with an above-fold image should have this. 2. **Using `loading="lazy"` on above-the-fold images.** Lazy loading defers image downloads — that's the point. But applying it to your LCP element tells the browser to *wait* before loading your most critical image, directly worsening LCP. Only lazy load images that appear below the fold. 3. **Forgetting `width` and `height` on dynamically loaded images.** CMS platforms like WordPress often strip dimension attributes from uploaded images. Without them, every image causes layout shift as it loads. Always re-add dimensions, even if your CMS removes them. | Mistake | Why It's Bad (2026 Data) | Better Approach |
| --------- | -------------------------- | ------------------ | |||||
| Using only JPEG/PNG | Missing 30–50% compression savings vs AVIF/WebP | Use AVIF with WebP + JPEG fallbacks | |||||
| No responsive images | Mobile users download 3–5x oversized files | Implement srcset + sizes attributes | |||||
| Missing lazy loading | Non-critical images compete for bandwidth with LCP | Add loading="lazy" to all below-fold images | |||||
| Lazy loading the LCP image | Directly delays the most important render metric | Use fetchpriority="high" instead |
| AVIF | 50%+ vs JPEG | 90%+ | Easy |
|---|---|---|---|
| --------- | -------------------------- | ------------------ | |
| Using only JPEG/PNG | Missing 30–50% compression savings vs AVIF/WebP | Use AVIF with WebP + JPEG fallbacks | |
| No responsive images | Mobile users download 3–5x oversized files | Implement srcset + sizes attributes | |
| Missing lazy loading | Non-critical images compete for bandwidth with LCP | Add loading="lazy" to all below-fold images | |
| Lazy loading the LCP image | Directly delays the most important render metric | Use fetchpriority="high" instead |
| Responsive Images (srcset) | 40–60% on mobile | 100% | Medium | ## Common Mistakes to Avoid The #1 mistake in 2026 is serving full-resolution images without a responsive `srcset` — mobile users end up downloading desktop-sized files, bloating their payload by 3–5x. Here's how to avoid the most damaging errors. 1. **Skipping `fetchpriority="high"` on the LCP image.** Without this attribute, the browser treats your hero image with the same priority as every other resource. The fix is a single HTML attribute — there's no excuse not to add it. Every page with an above-fold image should have this. 2. **Using `loading="lazy"` on above-the-fold images.** Lazy loading defers image downloads — that's the point. But applying it to your LCP element tells the browser to *wait* before loading your most critical image, directly worsening LCP. Only lazy load images that appear below the fold. 3. **Forgetting `width` and `height` on dynamically loaded images.** CMS platforms like WordPress often strip dimension attributes from uploaded images. Without them, every image causes layout shift as it loads. Always re-add dimensions, even if your CMS removes them. | Mistake | Why It's Bad (2026 Data) | Better Approach |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Using only JPEG/PNG | Missing 30–50% compression savings vs AVIF/WebP | Use AVIF with WebP + JPEG fallbacks | |||||
| No responsive images | Mobile users download 3–5x oversized files | Implement srcset + sizes attributes | |||||
| Missing lazy loading | Non-critical images compete for bandwidth with LCP | Add loading="lazy" to all below-fold images | |||||
| Lazy loading the LCP image | Directly delays the most important render metric | Use fetchpriority="high" instead |
| --------- | -------------------------- | ------------------ |
|---|---|---|
| No responsive images | Mobile users download 3–5x oversized files | Implement srcset + sizes attributes |
| Missing lazy loading | Non-critical images compete for bandwidth with LCP | Add loading="lazy" to all below-fold images |
| Lazy loading the LCP image | Directly delays the most important render metric | Use fetchpriority="high" instead |
| Using only JPEG/PNG | Missing 30–50% compression savings vs AVIF/WebP | Use AVIF with WebP + JPEG fallbacks |
|---|---|---|
| Missing lazy loading | Non-critical images compete for bandwidth with LCP | Add loading="lazy" to all below-fold images |
| Lazy loading the LCP image | Directly delays the most important render metric | Use fetchpriority="high" instead |
| No responsive images | Mobile users download 3–5x oversized files | Implement srcset + sizes attributes |
|---|---|---|
| Lazy loading the LCP image | Directly delays the most important render metric | Use fetchpriority="high" instead |
| Missing lazy loading | Non-critical images compete for bandwidth with LCP | Add loading="lazy" to all below-fold images |
|---|
Keep Reading
FAQ Section  ### Q: How do images affect Core Web Vitals scores? **Images directly impact LCP, CLS, and indirectly affect INP (Interaction to Next Paint).** LCP measures how long the largest visible element takes to render — on 78% of pages, that element is an image. Unoptimized images delay LCP. Missing `width`/`height` attributes cause layout shift (CLS). Large image payloads block the main thread, slowing interaction responsiveness. According to [Google's Web Vitals documentation](https://web.dev/vitals/), passing all three Core Web Vitals thresholds requires addressing image optimization as a foundation. ### Q: What is the best image format for Core Web Vitals in 2026? **AVIF is the best image format for Core Web Vitals in 2026**, delivering 50%+ compression savings over JPEG at comparable visual quality. With 90%+ browser support confirmed by [Can I Use](https://caniuse.com/avif), AVIF is now the practical default. Use a `<picture>` element with WebP as fallback and JPEG as the final fallback for maximum compatibility without sacrificing performance. ### Q: What LCP score do I need to pass Core Web Vitals? **Your LCP must be under 2.5 seconds to score "Good" in Google's Core Web Vitals assessment.** Scores between 2.5 and 4.0 seconds are "Needs Improvement," and anything above 4.0 seconds is "Poor." [Google's PageSpeed Insights](https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/) measures LCP at the 75th percentile of real user sessions, meaning 75% of your visitors must experience LCP under 2.5 seconds. ### Q: Does lazy loading improve Core Web Vitals? **Yes — lazy loading improves LCP and reduces initial page payload by 30–50%, but only when applied correctly.** Apply `loading="lazy"` exclusively to images below the fold. Never apply it to your LCP image. When used correctly, lazy loading reduces the bytes the browser processes on initial load, freeing bandwidth for the LCP element to download faster. [MDN Web Docs](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Performance/Lazy_loading) provides full implementation guidance. ### Q: How do I find which image is causing my LCP failure? **Run your URL through Google PageSpeed Insights — it identifies the exact LCP element and its load time.** In the "Diagnostics" section, you'll see the specific image URL, its file size, and how long it took to load. Chrome DevTools also highlights the LCP element in the Performance panel. Once identified, apply `fetchpriority="high"`, convert to AVIF, and add a preload link in your `<head>`. ### Q: Will converting WebP images to JPEG improve performance? **No — converting WebP to JPEG increases file size and reduces performance.** WebP is a more efficient format than JPEG, so converting in that direction produces larger files. The only reason to convert WebP → JPEG is for compatibility with software that doesn't support WebP (like some older design tools or print workflows). For web performance, always move toward AVIF or WebP, never away from them. ### Q: How much can image optimization improve my Core Web Vitals? **Proper image optimization typically improves LCP by 40–60% on image-heavy pages.** The exact improvement depends on your baseline — sites serving uncompressed PNGs or oversized JPEGs see the largest gains. Combining format conversion (JPEG → AVIF), responsive images (srcset), and LCP preloading delivers compounding improvements. A realistic timeline for seeing stable improvements in Google Search Console field data is 2–4 weeks after deployment. ## Conclusion & CTA Optimizing images for [Core Web Vitals](/blog/lazy-loading-images-boost-your-website-speed-in-2026) is the highest-leverage performance investment you can make in 2026 — it directly improves LCP, eliminates CLS, and reduces the payload that slows every other metric. > **TL;DR**: Images cause 45–55% of page weight and drive LCP failures on 78% of pages. Fix this by converting to AVIF (50%+ smaller than JPEG), implementing responsive `srcset`, adding `fetchpriority="high"` to your LCP image, and applying `loading="lazy"` to below-fold images. These four changes alone can move a failing [Core Web Vitals](/blog/avif-vs-webp-best-image-format-for-web-in-2026) score to "Good" within 2–4 weeks. **Key takeaways:**
- AVIF is the default format choice in 2026 — 90%+ browser support removes any compatibility concern
- The
fetchpriority="high"on your LCP image is the single highest-ROI HTML attribute you're probably not using- Missing
width/heightattributes are the leading cause of CLS failures — fix them unconditionally ---
🚀 Ready to Get Started? Stop spending hours manually converting and resizing images. this platform compresses and converts your images to AVIF and WebP in seconds, so you can fix your Core Web Vitals without touching a command line. **Why thousands choose the optimizer:**
- ✅ Converts JPEG/PNG → AVIF/WebP instantly for maximum compression
- ✅ No account required to get started
- ✅ Handles batch conversions — optimize your entire image library at once 👉 Start Optimizing Now — It's free to try! Have questions? Contact our team. --- ## Related Articles - Lazy Loading Images: Boost Your Website Speed in 2026
- AVIF vs WebP: Best Image Format for Web in 2026
- How to Optimize Images for Your Website in 2026